I used Antelope 10MX on my dCS Vivaldi system for two years before changing to Cybershaft OP20. OP20 is clearly way better than Antelope 10MX.I am currently on Antelope. So, one of these will trounce the Antelope ?
I used Antelope 10MX on my dCS Vivaldi system for two years before changing to Cybershaft OP20. OP20 is clearly way better than Antelope 10MX.
Actually I bought a Cybershaft OP13 before. I did a detailed comparison between 10MX and OP13. 10MX is a little better in my system. I can said 10MX is similar to OP15/16. OP20 is a lot better, as CKKeung said it is like day and night.
Did you compare it with the Mutec REF10 https://mutec-net.com/product_ref_10.php ?
I think the best 10Mhz reference you're going to get (without an atomic clock and a physicist to run it for you) is from a global positioning system disciplined oscillator. I've attached a picture of mine, which I use as a reference source for my function generators and frequency counters. I'm sorry if the pictures are a little blurry.
I think the best 10Mhz reference you're going to get (without an atomic clock and a physicist to run it for you) is from a global positioning system disciplined oscillator. I've attached a picture of mine, which I use as a reference source for my function generators and frequency counters. I'm sorry if the pictures are a little blurry.
Would a GPSDO used as an external reference to an OCXO reduce phase noise? I think it would, you would also limit the gate time so that there would be less fluctuation. But then I'm talking about test equipment.What is the purpose of absolute accuracy in this task? Do you think that a GPS or atomic clock disciplined oscillator has lower phase noise than alternative designs?
Would a GPSDO used as an external reference to an OCXO reduce phase noise? I think it would, you would also limit the gate time so that there would be less fluctuation. But then I'm talking about test equipment.
Regardless, an OCXO would need to establish a stable temperature (running for about 24 hours to get best performance) before it reaches maximum stability.
My question is that I do not see "maximum stability" or "accuracy" as something relevant to audio. The main parameter - although not proved - seems to be phase noise. And very few manufacturers publish data on it.
Accuracy has been mainly used for the "numbers war" - both in analog and digital marketing.
Would a GPSDO used as an external reference to an OCXO reduce phase noise? I think it would, you would also limit the gate time so that there would be less fluctuation. But then I'm talking about test equipment.
Regardless, an OCXO would need to establish a stable temperature (running for about 24 hours to get best performance) before it reaches maximum stability.
Really? As you say, it must be the implementation.
I am on my way to office/work.
Will share with you info/photos of those Mainland China GPSD clocks with you later.
I bought a cheap GPSDO 10MHz clock from China. It locks to GPS signal to enhance its performance. This little device enhanced the sound of my dCS Vivaldi combo. Several of my friends bought it as well and were very happy with it. For a very small amount of money, it brought very noticeable improvement, a good bargain indeed.Excellent!