For many of us, IT is a dark art - something mysterious which we try to avoid - and I can understand how many might swerve away from switches etc. If we however try to visualise the network delivering our music as a compact disc, then things may start to make more sense.
With a basic domestic router / ethernet and all its inherent noise pollution, that CD is scratched and smeared with grease. Let’s call that the base point on a scale of 1 to 10.
What would a '10' be? I guess multiple swiches / lps / fibre etc. That imaginary CD has been cleaned and polished / the edges lathed and covered in green pen / the centre blacked out / Nespa’d etc.
Where were most people on this scale back in the day of playing CDs? Probably 3-5 I guess, with some cleaning and green penning going on but avoiding the OCD rabbit hole of tedious lathing and nespa’ing. The network equivalent of this would be using a decent ethernet cable / installing an LPS on your router / using some form of galvanic isolation.
The network signal is extremely susceptible to high frequency noise which is best exorcised and I think the important thing here is to find a level of noise management which one personally feels comfortable with.
Mark,
My analogy with the network stuff is that you have a Ferrari in the Extreme, BUT you have a road filled with bumps and potholes that the Ferrari is driving on. The Ferrari is still a Ferrari and still performs to an awesome level, but if the road is repaired and smoothed out (the network), then the Ferrari/Extreme becomes unleashed and can perform at a higher level.
I believe that the network, like everything else is system/user dependent. What works for one might make no difference to another. Reason being, ie in my case I had a SERIOUS bottleneck, BUT my system still sounded really good. BUT once the networking bottleneck(s) were removed the Extreme went to another level. BUT that was in my system, which I believe has nothing to do with someone else's system/network.