Steve
This is on top of the last insanely good backend update?
This refers to the 27th of April backend update, so yes.
Steve
This is on top of the last insanely good backend update?
I got that part...thanks.This refers to the 27th of April backend update, so yes.
...so confirming: you have Reference DD and it plays as expected with XDMS? Thus far, it will not operate here. Did you need to change any settings in XDMS? Thanks for your reply @ArmsanIt connects flawlessly either with Quadrate USB module or Pro ISL module.
yes xmds function with msb reference only that it does not show the correct bits on the display but only and always 16, instead of 24 or 32....so confirming: you have Reference DD and it plays as expected with XDMS? Thus far, it will not operate here. Did you need to change any settings in XDMS? Thanks for your reply @Armsan
Can I ask a question to all the Extreme devotees out there?
How is the performance on older exclusively analog recordings versus newer primarily digital ones?
Comments also from those who run top TT based systems who've become enamoured with the Extreme.
I'm curious as to how eg Philips classical and Blue Note from 50s and 60s, and classic rock from 60s and 70s, and CD crossover period 80s and 90s recordings thru the world's premier digital source sound in comparison to LP, and the delta to today's 100% digital provenance recordings.
Because I still hear that Extreme is at its best with these later all digital masterings, all analog masterings from the Golden Age of recordings not so much.
I got that part...thanks.
I just am in amazement that there's more improvement...
The last backend update was stupid good...
Can't wait to hear this!!
Finish chores, then music.. finish chores, then music.. keep repeating.
@Emorante I believe this depends on the ASIO channel selected, but yes, the display can be "off" in the dac. Thank you for your reply.
Can I ask a question to all the Extreme devotees out there?
How is the performance on older exclusively analog recordings versus newer primarily digital ones?
Comments also from those who run top TT based systems who've become enamoured with the Extreme.
I'm curious as to how eg Philips classical and Blue Note from 50s and 60s, and classic rock from 60s and 70s, and CD crossover period 80s and 90s recordings thru the world's premier digital source sound in comparison to LP, and the delta to today's 100% digital provenance recordings.
Because I still hear that Extreme is at its best with these later all digital masterings, all analog masterings from the Golden Age of recordings not so much.
That's my very Q...I really don't knowDoesn’t the difference depend more on the source material and mastering than the playback equipment?
That's my very Q...I really don't know
That's my very Q...I really don't know
I have done, at The General's on my second visit. Doesn't answer my Q.Take the prog rock recordings you have and play them on good quality analog gear...you will find out...lol
I have done, at The General's on my second visit. Doesn't answer my Q.
I have a several DSD256 60's jazz recording files ie, Armstrong, Ellington, Miles Davis etc that sound amazing with the Extreme. These recordings would be my best demo recordings if someone would want to hear the best digital sound that I can produce.
I differ with Diminches because I listen to a lot of rock from the 60's and 70s that were not great recordings, but I love the way they sound with the Extreme. I've never heard them sound so good. I think everyone's experience is different based on their system(s)/rooms etc.
After 16,976 posts, I think there's space to talk masterings then and now via the Extreme.it will lower the SQ. that’s my point. So… You need golden era records. How you get around to buying them is a different question…but we digress. Back to the thread.
Improvement is putting it mildly. The SQ is in a different galaxyCan’t wait to jump on the XDMS wagon, still using TAS which sounds great, but apparently room for improvement!