Tim,
Thanks for the comments.
My KLAudio has the internal tank. Your comment about filling the filter canister is what I was thinking about. If I don't do that then when the system starts up it first fills the canister. Yesterday when I was all done with the cleaning, the KLAudio tank was far from filled since a good amount of that water ended up in the system, including the canister.
Now that I have a filtration system I have to think about whether it is worth it to add the USC and rotisserie and just have a complete cleaner. I like the KLAudio and I like the fact that it dries. However, I have started to hand scrub records with l'art du son and a brush first and then run it through the KLAudio. I find this method clears some of the crud that the KLAudio does not. I am not sure that the DIY cleaner is a good replacement for the hand scrubbing.
Are there any DIY setups that scrub too?
Yes, you want the filter cannister full as you can get it before you turn on the pump. It can be a bit messy with extra water, but having it full is much more effective, less work for the pump and you don't send air back into the tank. If there is enough room where you locate your cleaning system, you might consider putting it inside a tub. I use one designed to go under a washing machine with a lip maybe 2 inches high - keeps all water contained.
I'm not aware of a DIY setup that also scrubs - but it would not surprise me if someone built one. The only thing close that I know of is the AudioDeske.
Let me offer a small editorial on the issue you raise.
First, after using a variety of cleaning methods, including the Loricraft and ADS, I'm convinced that surfactants are necessary for cleaning records. In my opinion, water alone in an USC is simply not enough - at least as a general rule. It is difficult to remove mold release agents, grease (fingerprints) and other non-soluable substances without some kind of surfactant. (I know some KLA users will disagree, that's okay.) Time is also a factor. I have not used water alone in an USC for a lengthy period (30 minutes +), so I can't speak to whether that could do the same job as having a surfactant in the water.
If you really want to scrub or think scrubbing is needed, my suggestion is to go with something like the Loricraft or Monks. The job of these machines is to rotate the record while vacuuming off liquid. The end-user's job is to add cleaning solution and lightly agitate (not scrub) the liquid on the record with a brush. Let the solution do the work. Agitation keeps the dislodged dirt suspended in solution so it doesn't settle back onto the record. This approach does work - see my kinda long article on the topic
here as part of a discussion on cleaning fluid and technique. You can get records very very clean with that method, but the downside is it's messy and very time consuming. Those reasons alone brought success to the KLA, ADS, type machines.
The best thing desktop machines have going for them is convenience. And, without an external filter they take up less space. I try to be agnostic when it comes to the slotted vertical desktop machines. It is great to have these in marketplace because they make cleaning easy and that encourages people to play records.
Of course I'll pitch the DIY approach to anyone interested in the best solution with today's technology.
A primary advantage of DIY is you control (almost) all aspects of clearning: solution composition, cleaning time, temperature, ultrasonic frequency. Open stainless steel tanks are so much easier to keep clean.
With DIY you can clean more records in a given amount of time than a single-slot unit. That's a function of the rotisserie and tank size one chooses. I clean 10-11 records in an hour - that's from taking out of their covers to putting them back in.
The desktop machines do offer fan-based drying. The case I make in my
third DIY article is that by using a filter to keep the solution clean then air drying is viable. A little wetting agent in the solution helps sheet water off the record when removed from the tank. I find a spindle of 5-6 records drys in 10 miuntes. If you don't have a removable spindle, use a small dish rack. Whether with a fan or air drying, ensuring whatever water is on the records is very clean when drying starts - that's the key.
The entry point for DIY can be fairly inexpensive. A cheap chinese US tank and a cheap rotisserie should be less than $500. You already have the filter built (congrats). The unit I ended up building costs about as much as an ADS or KLA, but that's with a commercial US tank and a top quality rotisserie. You can start for less. I think a Loricraft should be under $2k (£1311.56 ) check
here for more info; they used to have a U.S. distributor, but no more, afaik. I"m not suggesting that approach but it is an option.
Thoughts?