Taiko Audio SGM Extreme : the Crème de la Crème

I make damn fine instant coffee
An excellent sandwich
And am so slow I'm comatose
 
  • Like
Reactions: the sound of Tao
Thanks, I do live in Köln for many years now, but actually grew up in a wine region (Ahr) close by!
For whites I tend to go for German wines too, for reds I like to look a bit more south :)

Agree,
no German reds for me as well, but even for German whites do exist some nice alternatives:)

Christoph,

it has always been a great pleasure and a highlight to meet you and the other Taiko team members at HE Munich in the last years and I am really happy to have you here at WBF as well.

Claudia and I wish you all the best for your new Consultant job at Taiko, it must be most inspiring to work together with the designer of the worlds best server.

We hope to meet you soon again.

Matt and Claudia

BTW, our favorite espresso is Kimbo Extreme:)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tsaett
For Roon, audiophiles concerned with SQ is really a very small niche, so Taiko Extreme users are a niche within a niche and unlikely to be listened to unless Roon users suddenly experience an epiphany in terms of sound quality but I wouldn’t hold your breath

The vast majority of audiophiles running Roon are not using an Extreme. There is a large subset of Roon users using HQPlayer who are very keen to sound quality.
 
Darryl, I think you missed the point of my post. It had nothing to do with Windows versus Linux or why Emile made the choices that he made. Clearly, to the ears of all who have purchased an Extreme, Emile made the right choices.

My post had to do with the pitfalls that lay ahead. A stock install of Roon on top of a stock install of Windows 10 on a basic PC is probably not going to sound better than a stock install of Stylus and Euphony on that same PC to most ears. This is because Euphony and Stylus were designed with SQ as their top priority whereas Roon and Windows were not. As these products continue to evolve, Euphony and Stylus will continue to evolve with SQ as their top priority whereas Roon and Windows will continue to evolve with other priorities in mind, at least based on historical precedent and this means we will need to continue to rely on Emile to have to rescue us. There may come a time when Emile will be unable to offer a fix.

With the OS, it's less challenging because it can be forever locked down. With Roon, you cannot forever avoid updates. What would be ideal is if Roon could create a spinoff product called Roon Lite that was free of all the bloat and focused only on 3 things: (1) Sound quality, (2) sound quality, and (3) sound quality. Even better would be if Enno Vandermeer asked Emile to head this up. Otherwise, I see something other than Roon in my future.

Thanks Roy. I'm not so sure we could forever lock down Windows though. I'm pretty sure I read Emile used the LTSC version, and it will receive a rollup update every 3 years, though admittedly that is practically an eternity in IT terms.
 
Euphony may have done the playback part right, best the rest of it is amateurish. That thing locked up on me so many times, and I couldn't do a reinstall. I take no pleasure in saying these things.

IMO, the best alternative to Roon on a Windows platform is Audirvana.
The main focus is on SQ, it is very lightweight(23MB) and it has a very good Qobuz integration which is better than Roon.
It is perfect for audiophiles who want to do streaming only.

Matt
 
Last edited:
IMO, the best alternative to Roon on a Windows platform is Audirvana.
The main focus is on SQ, it is very lightweight(23MB) and ir has a very good Qobuz integration which is better than Roon.
It is perfect for audiophiles who want to do streaming only.

Matt

That's good to know Matthias. Audirvana was my first player, at that time limited to Mac.

Btw, where are you from in Germany? You mentioned München above. Year before last we were vacationing in Bavaria, and just happened to be in München the first day of Hi-End. I got to meet some of the guys for the first time.
 
Ah, we visited Freiburg 3 years ago, when we flew in to Mulhouse to drive around Alsace. Not sure when we'll be back now.
 
The vast majority of audiophiles running Roon are not using an Extreme. There is a large subset of Roon users using HQPlayer who are very keen to sound quality.
So why would anyone use HQPlayer with Roon, given the added complexity that HQ player involves? The only reason I can think of is because of HQPlayer’s ability to enhance Roon’s SQ, which was basically the point I was making. So let’s say that Roon notice that a lot of users are using HQ Player and decide to add similar capability to Roon. For anyone not wanting to use HQPlayer, that’s ’bloat’.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jon
bloat = an excess of software code that has nothing to do with SQ and likely is negatively impacting SQ often due to high latency

This is typically seen in software that tries to do too much.

An example of a software player with no bloat would be something like Bug Head Emperor which had a cult following once upon a time because it focused on doing only one thing well and that was excellent SQ. It had an archaic interface but the whole program was only about 60MB.

bughead2.jpg


Roon Core is many GBs in size when you include the metadata database. Probably no one wants to go back to something as archaic as BHE and so this is why people buy an Extreme because it requires an Extreme to get something like Roon to sound as good. Should Roon continue to bloat up, even the Extreme may not be enough to rescue it and the dreadful sound I heard coming out of my Extreme the other day tells me this could happen.
OK, then what would your approximate definition of "Roon Lite" be?
 
So why would anyone use HQPlayer with Roon, given the added complexity that HQ player involves? The only reason I can think of is because of HQPlayer’s ability to enhance Roon’s SQ, which was basically the point I was making. So let’s say that Roon notice that a lot of users are using HQ Player and decide to add similar capability to Roon. For anyone not wanting to use HQPlayer, that’s ’bloat’.

Why would anyone use the "bloat" of Roon when the focus of the Extreme is on bit-perfect playback.
There are reports that SQ of Roon plus HQP is about the same as Audirvana alone.

Matt
 
So why would anyone use HQPlayer with Roon, given the added complexity that HQ player involves? The only reason I can think of is because of HQPlayer’s ability to enhance Roon’s SQ, which was basically the point I was making. So let’s say that Roon notice that a lot of users are using HQ Player and decide to add similar capability to Roon. For anyone not wanting to use HQPlayer, that’s ’bloat’.

Some people feel that upsampling gets the most out of the system (or DAC). It isn’t just a statement about Roon.

Isn’t HQPlayer available on the Extreme? I know it was on prior servers made by Emile.
 
Why would anyone use the "bloat" of Roon when the focus of the Extreme is on bit-perfect playback.
There are reports that SQ of Roon plus HQP is about the same as Audirvana alone.

Matt
I’m afraid I don‘t understand your question. Anything defined as ‘bloat’ are essentially extra lines of code that are unused to achieve the goal but that occupy/utilise system resources either to the detriment of the final result or that require extra resources or work-arounds to offset their negative effect.
 
Last edited:
Euphony may have done the playback part right, best the rest of it is amateurish. That thing locked up on me so many times, and I couldn't do a reinstall. I take no pleasure in saying these things.

Since you've criticized Euphony OS over several posts, let me just say that whatever your negative experience was, it is not universal. Certainly, my experience has been very positive, and Euphony's UI and UX are a joy to use in the context of Linux music servers. I'll be the first to admit Stylus is not even close to Roon in UX, but SQ-wise it runs circles around Roon. It is only on the Extreme, with Emile's heroic efforts, that Roon has been tamed.

As @romaz mentioned, he and I have found Željko, the developer, to be extremely receptive to our ideas, and collaboratively, we've caused SQ to rise even further.

I'll stop here, as it's OT for the Extreme thread, but I couldn't let this continued sniping go unanswered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adamaley
Since you've criticized Euphony OS over several posts, let me just say that whatever your negative experience was, it is not universal. Certainly, my experience has been very positive, and Euphony's UI and UX are a joy to use in the context of Linux music servers. I'll be the first to admit Stylus is not even close to Roon in UX, but SQ-wise it runs circles around Roon. It is only on the Extreme, with Emile's heroic efforts, that Roon has been tamed.

As @romaz mentioned, he and I have found Željko, the developer, to be extremely receptive to our ideas, and collaboratively, we've caused SQ to rise even further.

I'll stop here, as it's OT for the Extreme thread, but I couldn't let this continued sniping go unanswered.

I believe I made two posts about this. Just stating my experience since you thought it was so superior. I could've said a lot more, but I think I was fair and limited in what I said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adyc

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu