Remind me not to visit anytime soon.The more i sit at home and listen
to my high power consuming
stereo, the less I shower. Heating
water for showers is very power
consuming, ergo it becomes a null
sum exercise
Remind me not to visit anytime soon.The more i sit at home and listen
to my high power consuming
stereo, the less I shower. Heating
water for showers is very power
consuming, ergo it becomes a null
sum exercise
I always shower for visitors, never show up unannouncedRemind me not to visit anytime soon.
LolThe more i sit at home and listen
to my high power consuming
stereo, the less I shower. Heating
water for showers is very power
consuming, ergo it becomes a null
sum exercise
Oh myRemind me not to visit anytime soon.
For heaven sake Lagonda. Put the damn bath tub at the sweet spot between your MBLs.The more i sit at home and listen
to my high power consuming
stereo, the less I shower.
I hear bathing in milk will accentuate the highs more and widen the soundstage.For heaven sake Lagonda. Put the damn bath tub at the sweet spot between your MBLs.
Or you could watercool your gear. That way you could get at least warm water and properly cool your gearThe more i sit at home and listen
to my high power consuming
stereo, the less I shower. Heating
water for showers is very power
consuming, ergo it becomes a null
sum exercise
I would be afraid to try that. Imagine if the sound actually improved becauseFor heaven sake Lagonda. Put the damn bath tub at the sweet spot between your MBLs.
Water cooled audio equipment Hm i see a marketing potential. Maybe as an upgrade to older Krell amps. And of course for the ultimate audiophile, a versionOr you could watercool your gear. That way you could get at least warm water and properly cool your gear
Win-win and almost Greta-friendly
And what I responded was what I heard in my system with softwares and gears I owned and my logic choosing why I don't invest more in tape gears. By no mean I stated or implied that sound reproduced by tape machine is inferior to one reproduced by tt in general and if software involved is first grade. I could only say that given gears and softwares available to me at hands the difference in sound of vinyl vs tape is not significant. Therefore I chose to put my resource on vinyl base on what "make sense" to me.
Tang
If people prefer the signature of vinyl I can understand that, I do too. However "an actual master tape" is where its at but it is not something you can get a hold of. If we are lucky we can get close enough with ones like Analogue Production but if you go out and get tapes without provenance they can sound like anything, good or bad, there is no knowing it. I have even heard people copying from sacd to tape and selling them as master tape.
There is also a possibility of preferring what the mastering engineer or the cutting engineer did for vinyl version. Vinyl production brings certain idiosyncrasies with it.
Still, if we are talking about any kind of fidelity from our perspective, it can only be to what recording/mixing/mastering engineers did and that would be heard at the master tape which they have finalized. If you get a copy of that, that is as close as you get. Would you still prefer a mastered for vinyl version of it, of course you can, that is a preference.
I only have Muddy Waters - Folk Singer in all its incarnations to make a fair comparison. First pressing, 33rpm remaster, 45rpm remaster, dsd and master copy from AP. I prefer the tape version myself. I also do not like making these comparisons, I like listening to albums in whatever format they sound best in my system.
I heard the muddy waters folk singer original and another chess original at General's. My immediate reaction was to remark that you will take the Blues out if it if you process this original blues recording. I have just never heard such emotion in a guitar pluck