I was addressing streaming.
I know that Euphony buffers 2 songs in advance if you are streaming an album. It doesn’t do the entire album.
I was addressing streaming.
I know that Euphony buffers 2 songs in advance if you are streaming an album. It doesn’t do the entire album.
+1 on the folder view preference. At least make it an option, Roon. But they will not offer such a pedestrian thing, despite quite a number of users requesting this. They like to dictate the "correct" way to navigate one's music.+1 on everything except Roon. i find Roon completely unusable do to its inability to navigate folders.
i understand that i'm in a minority on that issue.
i assume that the Roon powers-that-be view folder navigation with the same respect they have for SQ
I connect my iPad through ethernet with an adapter to lightning. No Wi-Fi needed.I have been running a optimized wired network to my Extreme using my MacBook Pro to control Roon. Since TAS can only be controlled through an IPAD, what are other Extreme owners using to transmit a wifi signal.
My current network is ATT Fiber --> ONT --> EdgeX --> M12 --> Extreme.
Folder view is nicely implemented in TAS+1 on the folder view preference. At least make it an option, Roon. But they will not offer such a pedestrian thing, despite quite a number of users requesting this. They like to dictate the "correct" way to navigate one's music.
I have favorite recordings that are annoying to find on Roon, whereas with folder view in Foobar2000 I could fairly quickly navigate to them. I liked being able to sort by genre or what have you, too, in folder view. And Roon is less than optimal for classical, IMO.
Can we legally buffer an entire album before playing?
Hello - I may of missed it, but I recall seeing talk of a Taiko “mini”?
Is anyone familiar with that?
I know that Euphony buffers 2 songs in advance if you are streaming an album. It doesn’t do the entire album.
i was referring to local music tracks, where i think (?) i remember an option to load the entire playlist into ram
There you go, that's what I do also except I keep the network plugged in but completely shut down Roon. Also, try HQPlayer installed in memory and then load your music into memory (RAM disk) = best sound in my situation.I think that's a good way to go. Load the entire album or playlist. The Extreme has a lot more RAM than any other music server I have seen. I don't know if streaming services like Tidal/Qobuz allow that. Hopefully they do.
Building a player that is designed to work with the specific hardware is absolutely the best way to go in terms of sound quality. Congrats to Taiko for that decision and more importantly for making that happen and the first alpha release.
Creating software that satisfy everyone is a challenge. There would be nearly as many opinions as the people using it. And that is evident from the posts in the last 48 hours above. I see people who only care about SQ and that's all that matters to them. And there are those who prefer full functionality. And some in in between.
Here is how I see this.
- Roon is hard to beat in terms of functionality. It seems like it's lacking one function mentioned by a member above, but that is a rare exception. As far as I understand it, Roon would always be an option for Extreme users and will serve very well the people who have that as their priority.
- The problem with Roon is that they are not focused on sound quality. In fact I dare to say they don't care about sound quality (at all).
- And this is where the new player from Taiko takes over.
- It seems like TAS (or some parts of it) was designed with one main goal in mind - to achieve sound quality that is better than Roon and other players.
- It also seems like the Taiko team is convinced that they have accomplished that. And the next logical step was to share the software with a closed group of people to verify that is indeed the case in a wider range of systems. It's much easier to work with a small group of people in that stage.
- Taiko would iron out any wrinkles and release a beta version.
- This would be a constant work in progress - initially to improve the sound quality over other players, and then followed by adding more functionality until the gap with Roon gets much smaller.
If you are in one of the extremities, the solution is easy. If you care only about sound quality you switch to TAS and deal with the functionality issues (i.e. no gapless playback support, wait between songs, etc.). If you are on the other end end of the spectrum and prefer to have the functionality support, the solution is also easy - switch to Roon and enjoy it.
If you are somewhere in between, then you would need some extra patience.
Here is how I manage this: If I want to do a critical listening session, I shutdown Roon, start HQplayer, load my local files, disconnect the network and enjoy my playlist played with best SQ. If I listen music in the background or try to discover some new music on Qobuz, I use Roon.
The beauty of alpha testers is using a multitude of different DACS as this gives valuable data points. For me I am still at 8192 for DSD but now 2048 for PCM as I can only play 44.1 with the adaptive-1 buffer. Using the 2048 buffer I am able to play to DSD512 and PCM 352.8
Egged on by Emile last night, I purchased and downloaded a Louis Armstrong and a Sarah Vaughn DSD 256 album from High Definition TapeTtransfers, and Wow, I understand what you are talking aboutLike you I prefer adaptive-1 but am limited to only 44.1 so for now my PCM is at 2048 and very very good whereas 8192 for DSD is beyond the beyond. For me so far the rewards from TAS start with native DSD at the top of the list