Indeed, as dminches mentions, development of TAS has halted in favor of devoting all available resources to release XDMS. As it stands, YT music is not supported but we can add it to the list to consider.i've been away from the forums for a bit. wanted to check in to see if TAS has any plans to support youtube music. i know i know its not the highest quality but there are great mixes on youtube that are not available elsewhere so it would be a nice option
awesome, that would be great.Indeed, as dminches mentions, development of TAS has halted in favor of devoting all available resources to release XDMS. As it stands, YT music is not supported but we can add it to the list to consider.
Hi Francisco, development is ongoing and advancements are made every day. We are working on this full-time. At this time, we cannot share more.Hi Ed, Emile. July is running out. Any new update on dates for XDMS?
It's added. But there are many more items on the list and our core priority is to get XDMS released with the envisioned functionality. As it stands, it will be a massive improvement over TAS, not only in terms of Sound Quality but also in terms of functionality. Once it is out there, we can look into further enhancing it.awesome, that would be great.
thanks for the heads up - being able to skip forward and back on a track will be nice but I like how Ed described it as a digital version of spinning a recordIt's added. But there are many more items on the list and our core priority is to get XDMS released with the envisioned functionality. As it stands, it will be a massive improvement over TAS, not only in terms of Sound Quality but also in terms of functionality. Once it is out there, we can look into further enhancing it.
Noted. Thanks, Skanda!thanks for the heads up - being able to skip forward and back on a track will be nice but I like how Ed described it as a digital version of spinning a record
btw hifi-advice is a great site i've stumbled upon many times. keep up the great work!
I'm planning on exactly the same vlan changeover to isolate iot stuff.
My IT guru, who I've worked with for over 30 years since my early corporate days, will handle the design. I usually do all this stuff myself, but this time I acknowledge my limitations, particularly due to the security implications. A key part we have agreed upon will be replacing my Orbi access points with ubiquiti access points. Together with my ubiquiti 6P home router (which replaced FiOS' garbage switch), an all ubiquiti system is a faster and cleaner approach compared to the work required to integrate across platforms.
I've given him a network diagram of all the components and am waiting to see how he proposes partitioning things.
@Taiko Audio Emile - it's interesting that you mentioned tagged VLANs in particular.
Have you had different (less negative) experience with UN-tagged VLANs (based on port assignments only)?
I can see why tagged VLANs would degrade sonic quality as the switch is adding a 4 byte tag to each Ethernet frame per 802.1Q, i.e. altering the data, but with UNtagged VLANs the frames are unchanged.
The question is whether reducing broadcast/multicast traffic with an Audio-only VLAN or isolated network (same in regards to this) would be beneficial.
Might also depend on the switch/router in use.. my subjective results may not apply universally.
Thanks!
To start with the first step, have you enabled "Switch to Roon" in the TAS app, and can you confirm that the mode changed?Although I usually use TAS, today I went to use Roon and it can't connect to the kernel. I have restarted Extreme and the Modem Router, but it does not connect. Any ideas?
+1@Taiko Audio Emile - it's interesting that you mentioned tagged VLANs in particular.
Have you had different (less negative) experience with UN-tagged VLANs (based on port assignments only)?
I can see why tagged VLANs would degrade sonic quality as the switch is adding a 4 byte tag to each Ethernet frame per 802.1Q, i.e. altering the data, but with UNtagged VLANs the frames are unchanged.
The question is whether reducing broadcast/multicast traffic with an Audio-only VLAN or isolated network (same in regards to this) would be beneficial.
Might also depend on the switch/router in use.. my subjective results may not apply universally.
Thanks!
It is passive.Thanks. I think “active” ground is the culprit here. As far as I know, Shunyata’s system is passive - can anyone confirm?
I just need to take it step by step. When VNC'd to the desktop, right-click the start menu and open Computer Management, select Services, and find the TaikoRoon service. Right-mouse click, choose Properties, and confirm that it is on Automatic. Then, click Start. Or close the window, right-click on the service, and select Start. Confirm that the service has started and is running. Also, when it is running, right-mouse click Roon in the Win taskbar and check that "Run Roon on startup" is checked. If this is done and you still cannot connect to Roon, let me know.Yes of course, I activated Roon in the TAS application. Regarding VNC I have no problem, but it has to be on the Ipad.
@Taiko AudioPreliminary findings support this all being of minor relevance, the way the router handles traffic and/or distribution appears to dominate SQ. This is the reason we embarked on designing a router. It is actually not far out, hopefully releasing before Christmas.
I think that with the Ipad, it will be complicated. Tomorrow I'll try to bring a laptop home to do it.I just need to take it step by step. When VNC'd to the desktop, right-click the start menu and open Computer Management, select Services, and find the TaikoRoon service. Right-mouse click, choose Properties, and confirm that it is on Automatic. Then, click Start. Or close the window, right-click on the service, and select Start. Confirm that the service has started and is running. Also, when it is running, right-mouse click Roon in the Win taskbar and check that "Run Roon on startup" is checked. If this is done and you still cannot connect to Roon, let me know.
Sure. If you run into problems just mail support@taikoaudio.com and we can take it from there.I think that with the Ipad, it will be complicated. Tomorrow I'll try to bring a laptop home to do it.
I support this findings.Preliminary findings support this all being of minor relevance, the way the router handles traffic and/or distribution appears to dominate SQ. This is the reason we embarked on designing a router. It is actually not far out, hopefully releasing before Christmas.
Hearing all that - which I fully believe are influences to be considered - makes an integrated solution (network card, switch, router) by Taiko the desired product for most users. If it delivers 80-90% of the potential gains I would be more than happy! The remaining 10-20% I leave to be reaped by the tech-savvy users.I support this findings.
Did check many routers and they totally change the sound quality.
Also the system used makes big difference.
From the affordable solutions Ubiquity is far the best.
There are also clear benefits of getting the higher amounts of memory and better processor power in router but be prepare to pay for that.
That also generates more noise so there is a need to deal with that.
Settings are giving endless possibilities of improvement. So software is a king here as it is in extreme.
Also the architecture of the network makes difference!
It so much better to add a switch to the router
so router to switch is one connection
and from the swich to all other devices.