As the latest Taiko XDMS, NIC and switch upgrades run in, do those of you who’ve tried it find that the upgrade is quite difficult to describe in hi-fi terms due to the fact that simply everything about the music’s presentation got a lot better I.e its not easy to pick out individual elements in terms of the usual adjectives and a lot of improvements defy description, they just make the music more ‘magical’ and more like musicians actually creating the music in a real venue with the excitement and atmosphere of a live event?
Do you also find that each track has more of the elements of a ‘performance’ than has been the norm for a track played on a hi-fi? For example, you feel like clapping or cheering at the end of a great track?
Would you also agree that the most marked shift in performance is to your own reaction to the music, which is profoundly more involving and enjoyable and that it has become more difficult to listen analytically as you’re just swept up in the music’s rhythms and emotions?
Would you also agree that this level of upgrade defies the law of diminishing returns I.e. as the system gets better, the upgrades actually become more profound?
What I’m getting at; do you find these upgrades to the network somewhat different in nature to say an amplifier, tt or speaker upgrade?
Couldn't agree more, but you bring up two interesting questions.
First, whether the Extreme is producing an effect greater than say an amplifier? And second, that the reason for it is because the reproduction is now more emotional and defies description as opposed to conventional audiophile terms.
Form my limited perspective, describing music reproduction in audiophile terms is a left-brain analytical approach. It focuses on how "well" the reproduced sound approximates "real" music through proxy descriptors such as the dimensions of the soundstage, the depth of the bass, clarity of the upper end, PRAT etc.
On the other hand, a right-brain approach to listening to music is more visceral and focuses on the degree of emotional engagement in the music. The latter approach is not always within reach, however.
My personal preference is for the latter. When I go to a live musical event especially classical, I don't think about soundstage or how well the bass sounds. So for me, the quality of my system is all about the emotional response and level of engagement in the music.
Without a doubt, the Extreme provides a non-diminishing increase in the emotional engagement in unprecedented ways.
But to me, this is not due to the Extreme alone, but rather because Taiko has relentlessly addressed the historically limiting factor in the digital playback reproduction chain - the high noise floor present in the digital source. And in doing so, the other instruments (e.g., an amplifier), which until now have been held back, are now free to operate farther along their performance curves to create a synergistic, non-diminishing increase in engagement.
And it is the system as a whole, in concert, which now produces the ear to ear grinning/goosebump enjoyment of music- almost like being at the live event itself; where the music just shuts off your left brain and you melt into the musical experience.