- As mentioned, I am worried about the riser cable aspect, and it seems that I have reason to. If you, or anyone else, happen to later on stumble across an “ok” cable-solution to this specific card I am all ears, to put it mildly. If not, perhaps a Taiko DAC in my server is not ment to be in my specific case.
A riser cable will do fine, we have incorporated a PCIe retimer. We‘re working on a multitude of interface options. In fact we have just decided to design a modular version to be able to accommodate a wide range of interface options at a reasonable price level. The interface section occupies 75% of the current card where the DAC / Analogue section occupies the remaining 25%. A different card for each option would make it very unaffordable (low qty per option).
Please note that Emile's comment above pertains to both the TACDA and TACCD cards. While it is not confirmed which output formats will be added/supported, I can confirm that they will not have USB and as such will not substitute the Taiko Enhanced USB card.
A riser cable will do fine, we have incorporated a PCIe retimer. We‘re working on a multitude of interface options. In fact we have just decided to design a modular version to be able to accommodate a wide range of interface options at a reasonable price level. The interface section occupies 75% of the current card where the DAC / Analogue section occupies the remaining 25%. A different card for each option would make it very unaffordable (low qty per option).
Please note that Emile's comment above pertains to both the TACDA and TACCD cards. While it is not confirmed which output formats will be added/supported, I can confirm that they will not have USB and as such will not substitute the Taiko Enhanced USB card.
Hi Matt, at this point, this is not confirmed. Our first release, in any event, will be the TACDA card in non-modular form with analog RCA outputs and S/PDIF RCA, BNC, and TOSlink digital outputs.
Christiaan,
there is one point I don't understand. Emile mentioned in a former post that the TACDA card is fully packed on both sides because of the elaborate DAC. Now in the post above he mentioned a DAC area of 25% for the modular card. Does that mean that this card offers a somewhat lighter DAC version?
Thx again
Modularity seems like an excellent approach, which will allow for maximum flexibility in manufacturing and for Taiko customers. This modular approach has worked well (IMO) for MSB and its users. It's easy (he says) and very helpful when system changes arise. Thanks Taiko!
There is a Streacom case that can fit cards in a vertical position. I modified the FC10 and replaced the back panel to accommodate this. Have you tried that?
Thanks dminches,
For me equal, preferably slightly better, thermal properties than the HDPLEX H5v3 is a must for me to consider getting another chassis. I guess this is a sideways movement at best. But no need for a riser cable, with the right back plate, is indeed a good thing.
A riser cable will do fine, we have incorporated a PCIe retimer. We‘re working on a multitude of interface options. In fact we have just decided to design a modular version to be able to accommodate a wide range of interface options at a reasonable price level. The interface section occupies 75% of the current card where the DAC / Analogue section occupies the remaining 25%. A different card for each option would make it very unaffordable (low qty per option).
Good to know Emile. Thanks.
I suppose getting the best possible riser cable eventually is a good thing nevertheless.
“The Modular version would remove the fixed analog and S/PDIF outputs and substitute one of the below: 1) Analogue out”
Would this (later) version of “Analogue out” possibly mean balanced out? For me, balanced output only is better than combined RCA and digital outputs. But perhaps that is not a common wish? (I understand that it creates more heat.)
“Powered via an internal DC power cable from the Extreme power supply”
I do not know the Voltage being fed from the Extreme. Perhaps the DC Voltage range to feed the card for non Extreme users eventually, will be revealed later.
A riser cable will do fine, we have incorporated a PCIe retimer. We‘re working on a multitude of interface options. In fact we have just decided to design a modular version to be able to accommodate a wide range of interface options at a reasonable price level. The interface section occupies 75% of the current card where the DAC / Analogue section occupies the remaining 25%. A different card for each option would make it very unaffordable (low qty per option).
+1
You mention enhanced DAC, I hope for XLR based on the original plan (easily dropping digital out if needed). Not synonyms, but we are on a similar path. Analogue priority in one version of the PCIe
I have no idea what translates audibly from that beautiful piece, but my sense is that Taiko's ingenuity and products equate to the historically relatively little known artist working out of their small studio that has the promise to be remembered well into the arc of the future during this rapidly developing moment to define what is achievable by digital playback. really can’t wait to hear it.
Count me in for the XLR output Option. As Emile said a myriad of options wouldn‘t be economical due to lower volumes for each. But I‘d feel 2-3 versions (like the current one in planning, plus an additional all analog / xlr only (if that takes all the physical space), plus a third option with purely digital outputs) would be a good variety to choose from where say 90% of customers would find themselves happy with.
I‘m sure we can spend years cooking up all sorts of iterations & improvements, hence the decision to go modular now. This would also protect the value of the investment into the interface/controller technology which is by far the costliest part of the design.